The Ashes: 5th Test Teams

Australia: Rogers, Warner, Watson, Clarke (c), Smith, Bailey, Haddin (wkt), Johnson, Harris, Siddle, Lyon.

England: Cook (c), Carberry, Bell, Pietersen, Ballance, Stokes, Bairstow (wkt), Borthwick, Broad, Anderson, Rankin

Three changes for England: Root for Ballance, Borthwick for Panesar and Rankin for Bresnan.

Find it strange that Joe Root has been dropped and Carberry retained. One seemed to be the future for England but now is on the scrap heap and the other is Carberry. Panesar clearly did not have the confidence of his captain which makes his selection on tour surprising.

World XI: Best with less than 5 tests

Following on from my post this morning naming my Australian XI derived from players who have played less than 5 test matches (but who have played at least 1), I have given some consideration to who would by in a World XI based on the same criteria.  This exercise is a large one and I found myself drawn to players that I knew the stories of and players whose statistics just made them impossible to resist.

Here is my World XI and their respective first class records:

Barry Richards (SA)

Tests Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors
4 339 28358 54.74 80 77 37.48 1

Tim Curtis (Eng)

Tests Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors
5 339 20832 40.68 43 14 58.07 0

Kim Barnett (Eng)

Tests Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors
4 479 28593 40.38 61 188 37.8 3

Stuart Law (Aus)

Tests Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors
1 367 27080 50.52 79 83 51.03 1

H H Kanitkar (Ind)

Tests Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors
2 146 10400 52.26 33 74 47.91 0

Rikki Clarke (Eng)

Tests Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors
2 164 7880 35.49 16 264 34.43 2

Warren Hegg (Eng)

Tests Games Runs Average 100s Catches Stumpings
2 348 11302 27.9 7 857 94

Andre Adams (NZ)

Tests Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors
1 160 4421 22.44 3 645 23.47 31

Nilesh Kulkarni (Ind)

Tests Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors
3 101 860 12.11 0 357 24.89 24

Neil Mallender (Eng)

Tests Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors
2 345 4709 17.18 1 937 26.31 36

Ottis Gibson (WI)

Tests Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors
2 177 5604 24.25 2 659 27.79 28

This has been an interesting exercise filled with hard luck stories and selection abominations whilst highlighting that for some players an excellent first class career does not make a test career.

The story of Barry Richards is well known: we can only be left to wonder what he would have done to the records of the game if he had not have been caught up in the apartheid ban.

Neil Mallender is a must pick for this team: having taken 5/50 on debut and 8 wickets in total in his first test match he was only given one more test match before being discarded by the English selectors never to be picked again.  The great Richie Benaud is on record as describing this act of lunacy as an absolute disgrace.

Entirely subjectively, this is my World XI. I am sure you will have a different team.  Please let me know what you think either in the comments to this blog OR on twitter @shumpty77.

Australian XI: Best to have played 5 tests or less

I was asked yesterday to consider or create an Australian Cricket XI from those players who didn’t quite make it for Australia.  I have looked at the records of the 171 players to have played 5 test matches or less for Australia and have come with an XI based on the players whose records at the first class level would have suggested that they would have done more.

Here is my XI:

Charles Bannerman

Bannerman opened the batting in Australia’s first test match and scored 165 in the second innings of that first test.  He went on to only play in 3 tests for his country despite a quality first class record, for the time as follows:

Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors Catches
44 1687 21.62 1 0 N/a 0 20

Wayne Phillips

Phillips came into the team in the place of the then vice captain of the team, Geoff Marsh. That factor alone meant that he was never likely to success, given that his captain, A Border, refused to join the Australian team at the venue of the test match until he had pleaded the dropped Marsh’s case. Phillips’ test match in Perth proved to be his only one.  His first class record stacks up against other openers of the time:

Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors Catches
60 3859 38.59 9 1 124 0 24

Martin Love

Love was a classical right hand number 3 batsman for Queensland who came into the test line up off the back of number of bumper seasons from the Bulls and after injuries to Steve Waugh and Damien Martyn.  He stayed in the team for 5 test matches and despite a maiden hundred in his last test series was dropped after Martyn’s injury heeled.  An excellent player of all bowling types he retired with the following first class record:

Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors Catches
214 16952 49.85 45 1 11 0 268

Stuart Law

Show me a follower of cricket in this current who says that there has been an unluckier player in this country than Stuart Law and I will show you someone who knows nothing about cricket.  Handed a debut in Perth when Steve Waugh was injured, Law scored 56 not out and was at the other end when R Ponting was out on 96 and Australia declared.  He would not play another test. I concede that law did have a significant one day career however I doubt there is another player with such a quality first class record who has only played one test match for his country in the world.  That record is:

Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors Catches
367 27080 50.52 79 83 51.03 1 407

Cameron White

Named the captain of his state at a very young age by one of the most astute judges of talent in the game, the late David Hookes, White had long been tapped for greatness in the Australian set up.  A four test stint in the team in the harshest of conditions (India) has been the reward for a consistent first class career that has seen him lead his state to multiple Sheffield Shield titles. Still playing the game his first class career currently stands at:

Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors Catches
137 8357 40.76 18 193 39.72 3 141

Andrew McDonald

McDonald came into the Australian test team at a time when Shane Watson was injured and Australia was playing the best team in the world, at the time, South Africa.  Batting at 6 / 7 and bowling as required McDonald let no one down however found himself out of the team after only 4 tests when Watson returned.  Another player still playing the game (albeit without a first class game since representing Australia A against South Africa in 2012) his first class record presently stands at:

Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors Catches
91 4573 39.76 11 201 28.64 5 65

Richie Robinson

Although he was a wicketkeeper-batsman, Robinson’s three Test appearances came on the 1977 tour of England as a specialist batsman. Unfortunately Robinson spent his whole career in the shadow of one man: Rod Marsh.  Before his debut, he had finished top of the Sheffield Shield batting averages, and on the 1977 Ashes tour he scored more runs and took more catches than the number 1 but still could not get a look in.  He finished his first class career as captain of Victoria and with a record that any wicketkeeper batsman of current times would be proud of:

Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors Catches
97 4776 39.8 7 0 N/a 0 289

Peter McIntyre

What happens when you are a leg spinner and your career comes at the same time of Shane Warne AND Stuart MacGill? You end up playing only 2 tests including one in India like the international career of Peter McIntyre. Unwieldy in the field, out of depth with the willow but with a wrong un that spat from the pitch McIntyre would have been the prototype for a leg spinner who batted at 11 and would have (and probably should have) played more but for Warne.  His first class average if not great bat playing at the Adelaide Oval 5 games out of every 10 will do that to your numbers:

Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors Catches
97 798 8.06 0 322 39.66 12 33

Chris Matthews

Some of my earliest memories of watching cricket are from watching bowl at the Gabba in the opening tests of the summer in 1986 and 1988.  Those tests plus one more constitute the sum total of Matthews test career.  Why? Because Matthews was crippled by nerves and just could not land the ball.  Those performances are all the more astonishing when one considers that in first class cricket, particularly at his home ground of the WACA, Matthews was often close to unplayable.  Left arm fast swing bowlers do not come around often and Matthews was up there with the best: when he could land them.

Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors Catches
100 2146 20.24 0 380 28.1 22 31

Jo Angel

Standing at 6ft 6in and broad through the chest, Jo Angel, it is simple to say, scared the life of first class batsmen when they came to Perth to play Western Australia.  The West Indies, who he faced in his first test match at that ground in 1992 were less worried and belted him.  Angel was next in the baggy green in Pakistan where he toiled manfully for limited return.  After playing the then toughest opponent in World cricket and going on the toughest tour in world cricket, Angel was never to play for Australia again. He played for Western Australian until 2004 and possesses a fantastic record at first class level:

Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors Catches
121 1398 12.16 0 485 25.1 16 30

Mick Malone

I mentioned in the twitter exchanges that lead to this post that I was sure there would be a player in the team whose career was affected by World Series Cricket and that player is Mick Malone.  Malone played in only one test match before joining WSC and in that test match he performed well including snaring a 5 for.  In WSC though he was a peripheral player behind the likes of the Lillee and Walker and when WSC was over he never really got a look in despite continuing to perform well in first class cricket:

Games Runs Average 100s Wickets Average 5fors Catches
73 914 16.03 0 260 24.77 13 30

So there you have it: my “Best of less than 5 tests” Australian XI.  It is: Bannerman, Phillips, Love, Law, White, McDonald, Robinson, McIntyre, Matthews, Angel and Malone.  No doubt many will disagree with me but this is an XI that I think represents the best of those players who have not quiet reached their potential in the baggy green for reasons that range from the mental through the physical and ending with just not being selectors’ favourites.

Sorry Sachin: Kallis is the best of the modern greats BUT not the best all-rounder (mathematically speaking)

I have spent a lot of time of late pondering the career of Jacques Kallis and his place in the game.  There has been much made of the retirement of him and Tendulkar this year and much said in the media, both formal and social, of which of the two of them is the second best player after the great Sir Donald Bradman.

If I have said it once I have said it a thousand times: it is impossible to compare players from this generation with those who played in the 1930s and earlier and that premise probably extends right up to the 80s.  It is equally difficult to compare the records of the other “great” players of Kallis’ generation with his record because of his sustained excellence across both key forms of play: batting and bowling.

Thinking about it though, if one makes an assumption that a five wicket all by a bowler is akin to a batter scoring a hundred then there is a mathematical way to compare the careers of say Tendulkar and Muralitharan to Kallis simply by adding the amount of runs scored by the respective players to number of wickets taken by each player multiplied by 20 (on my hypothesis a wicket is equal to 20 runs).  I have taken the top 5 run scorers and top 5 wicket takers in the game (noting that they are all players of the modern age given the amount of test played when compared to 80s and before) and come up with the following table:

Player Runs Wickets Combined Rating
Tendulkar 15921 46 16841 4
Ponting 13378 5 13478 6
Kallis 13289 292 19129 1
Dravid 13288 1 13308 7
Lara 11953 0 11953 8
Muralitharan 1261 800 17261 3
Warne 3154 708 17314 2
Kumble 2506 619 14886 5
McGrath 641 563 11901 9
Walsh 936 519 11316 10

It is pretty clear from this mathematic approach to considering the greats of the modern game that Kallis is head and shoulders above the rest. I apologise to all Tendulkar fans for saying this but when you look at his overall contribution across both key aspects of the game but Kallis hits him out of the park.  Indeed Tendulkar is not, statistically, even the second best of the modern generation of players.  Both of Muralitharan and Warne best him based on a combined consideration of the player’s contribution to both key skills of the game.

Having established who is the mathematically superior player between Kallis and Tendulkar it got me thinking about coming up with a way of measuring the efforts of the previous all-round greats who have preceded Kallis.  Because of the lack of test matches played during the period from the 1950s through 1980s (when the great all-rounders were playing) the methodology for comparison of the players has been necessarily tweaked to consider each players average contribution to each game in which the played.  I have not considered any player that pre-dates 1950 for this analysis and have come up with this list of all-rounders: Kallis, Sobers, Hadlee, Dev, Botham, Khan and Benaud.  I am sure I have missed some from this analysis (be happy to hear your thoughts on who).

Most pundits of late seem to box Sobers and Kallis together and then the rest in a contest to determine who the best all-rounder to play the game is.  Based on the mathematical approach I have outlined, that position seems to be short sited.  Here are the results of applying a statistical analysis to foregoing list of all-rounders:

Player Tests Runs Wickets Combined Ave / game Rating
Kallis 166 13289 292 19129 115.23 5
Sobers 93 8032 235 12732 136.90 1
Hadlee 86 3124 431 11744 136.56 2
Kapil Dev 131 5248 434 13928 106.32 7
Imran Khan 88 3807 362 11047 125.53 4
Botham 102 5200 383 12860 126.08 3
Benaud 63 2201 248 7161 113.67 6

This analysis shows that Sobers contributed most, statistically, to each game he played when compared to each of the other “great’ all-rounders.  Unsurprisingly, when you consider his bowling strike rate, Hadlee comes in a close second and, frankly, a long way back, Kallis comes in fifth.

This analysis is, of course, necessarily predicated on the pure numbers each player has “put up” and does not account, at all, for the intangibles each brings to the game.  That said, I am absolutely comfortable with the outcome of the analysis: it strikes me that Kallis is the leader of the pack when it comes to the modern greats of the game because he was a true double threat (and that is forgetting his acumen in the slips) and, as such, was constantly involved in the game.  Tendulkar, by comparison, oft spent his time in the field stationed at mid off and did not have anywhere near the work load of Kallis.

I did not have the pleasure of watching Gary Sobers play but those who did always bracket him at the second greatest player to play the game after Bradman.  I mentioned in the preamble that it is really impossible to compare players for different eras.  That said, I am prepared to conclude that Sobers must be considered in any consideration of the player next after Bradman.  The player though that sticks out for me as having been missed out in a lot of consideration of the “great” players of the game is Sir Richard Hadlee.  His contribution to each game is only minimally lower than that of Sobers and, it must be remembered, he was regularly playing a team that was a losing rather than winning.

All of this number crunching proves one thing really: Kallis has had an unbelievable career of excellence at the top level of the game for a long time.  I, for one, believe he gets the short shrift from many in comparison to Tendulkar which is just statistically wrong.

With no active player in the top 10 players I have noted above of the modern, I am left to wonder who the next “modern great” will be.  One suspects he will come from Kallis’ own team or that of Tendulkar but only time will tell.

Australian ODI squad named: the usual suspects returned by the NSP whilst Queensland snubbed!

The National Selection Panel has named the following squad for the upcoming one day international series against England:

David Warner, Aaron Finch, Shane Watson, Shaun Marsh, Michael Clarke (capt), George Bailey (vice-capt), Brad Haddin (wk), Glenn Maxwell, James Faulkner, Mitchell Johnson, Nathan Coulter-Nile, James Pattinson, Clint McKay, Xavier Doherty

David Warner and Shaun Marsh return to the team that went to India before the home Ashes series as to does captain Michael Clarke. James Pattinson has been included in his ongoing return from injury.

There are some desperately unlucky players who have missed out on this team from that Indian tour: none more so that Philip Hughes and Adam Voges.

Statistics do not lie and both men had excellent 2013s years in the ODI side. Voges was 5th on the run scoring list for Australia in 2013 with 478 runs at 47.80. The decision to axe Hughes is even more unwarranted, in my opinion, given that he dominated the last series of ODIs at home with two centuries in five games and was Australia’s 3rd highest scorer with 660 runs at 36.66.

It must also be said that Ryobi Cup competition has again been ignored by the selectors as a selection tool. Queensland, the winners of the tournament, have not one player in the Australia squad. That is despite fielding the second highest run scorer of the competition in Usman Khawaja and 3 of the top 10 wicket takers in same with Ben Cutting looking particularly harshly done by given his additional work with the willow.

It is difficult to concede but seems to be true that the NSP is sending a message with this selection to the likes of Hughes, Khawaja, Voges and Cutting that they are not in the frame for the 2015 World Cup which is only 14 months away. It also must be said that the second message the NSP is giving is that the Ryobi Cup does not matter (unless you are David Warner) at the selection table. If it was otherwise than a player like C McKay, who had a shocking tour of India with 4 wickets at an average of 76.33 and an economy rate of 7.15, would have been dropped and any one of the following players selected:

  • S Abbott (16 wickets at 20.93)
  • J Hazlewood (12 wickets at 30.83
  • G Sandhu (11 wickets at 27.81)

As the Chairman of Selectors points out, we are only 14 months away from the World Cup and this series presented an opportunity to test players who might figure in that tournament. By returning to the “old faithful” in the likes of Marsh and McKay the NSP has missed an opportunity to both select players in better form and players of the future.

Is anyone really surprised?