Cricket: The Sheffield Shield finalists are becoming clearer

We are half way through Round 10 of the Sheffield Shield and, despite some of the bizarre play we have seen already, the identity of the combatants for the final are now much clearer.

In Canberra, the chances of the Western Australians were blown away in just 8 overs.  At 5-15 there was no recovery possible against the pace of the New South Welshmen and they were bundle out for 82.  As matters stand at the start of day 3, Western Australia lead by 34 runs with 5 second innings wickets in hand.  New South Wales are the short priced favourites for outright victory which would see them host the final.

At Bellerive Oval, the Tasmanians have played the South Australians out of a finals berth.  Only able to bat for 55 overs in the face of some excellent bowling from Jackson Bird, playing his first red ball game in 9 months, the South Australians have spent the better part of a day and half in the field.  They are almost 300 behind with ttwo days to go.  The prospect of the outright victory the South Australians need to secure a finals spot looks very remote.

The final match of the round sees Queensland on top of the Victorians at the MCG in a fixture they need to win outright to play in the finals.  That said they will be heartened by both what is going on at the field with the Bulls leading by 73 runs with 5 wickets in hand and also the fact that South Australia now look out of contention and Western Australia unlikely to secure any points from the game in Canberra. His efforts have received none of the plaudits of those from south of the border, but Queensland’s position has been set up by the bowling of James Hopes.  6 for 40 from the Queensland captain bowling with a stress fracture in his back is the epitome of a “captain’s knock”. Day 3 is “D” day for Queensland.  A lead of 150 / 200 and some early wickets will see them in the box seat.

New South Wales is in the box seat to host the final.  The other combatant looks likely to be Queensland however if they do not best the Victorians the finalist will be Western Australia.  Today will be a very interesting day of cricket.  It kicks off in a couple of hours. The live stream is available on foxsports.com.au.

Sheffield Shield: Round 10 and both final slots are up for grabs

It has been a funny old Sheffield Shield season with a massive gap right in the middle of it. The final round of the first class summer in Australia begins on Tuesday and there are four teams vying for a finals berth.

The points table, at the end of the 9th round of play, looks like this:

Teams Mat Won Lost Tied Draw Aban Pts Quotient For Against
Western Australia 9 4 2 0 3 0 26 1.052 4646/142 4758/153
South Australia 9 3 1 0 5 0 26 1.148 5071/133 5013/151
New South Wales 9 3 3 0 3 0 26 1.050 4715/148 4549/150
Queensland 9 3 2 0 4 0 22 1.124 4555/125 5185/160
Tasmania 9 2 4 0 3 0 16 0.878 4774/166 4552/139
Victoria 9 1 4 0 4 0 10 0.794 4976/154 4680/115

Obviously, Tasmania and Victoria are out of the running for the final. Each of the other four teams are all in with a shot of being in the final and even Queensland could host the final if results go their way.

These are the fixture kicking off on Tuesday:

· New South Wales v Western Australia at Canberra

· Tasmania v South Australia at Hobart

· Victoria v Queensland at Melbourne

The big game of the round is the fixture coming out of Canberra with a finals spot obviously up for grabs for the winner. If the game ends in a draw then the winner of first innings points will go to 28 points and that ought be enough to make the finals. For both teams, if they lose on first innings then they will still have a chance given that there are 6 points available for an outright win. New South Wales though will be hoping that Queensland do not win outright because if they win first innings points and then draw the game and Queensland win outright Queensland will go through to the final as they will have won more games outright.

South Australia will secure a finals spot if they get first innings points and Queensland fail to win outright or, again, even if they lose on first innings, if they procure an outright victory. Obviously, a win on first innings and outright gets them into the final without the need for count back.

For Queensland to figure in the finals they must win against Victoria on the first innings as well as outright to secure 6 points and jump to 28 points. Then they must rely on South Australia only winning on the first innings or not gaining points and one of New South Wales or Western Australia not getting any points from their encounter.

Looking at the games:

· Queensland have been assisted by the selection of the Australian T20 team as the Bushrangers will be without Daniel Christian, Aaron Finch, Cameron White and Glenn Maxwell. Maxwell, in particular had been in excellent form for the Vics so he will be a big loss. Conversely, Queensland will be basically at full strength and come into the game off the back of a massive win against the leaders of the competition, Western Australia. They will be looking at making it a season worthwhile for captain James Hopes who has been playing with stress fractures since the first round of the season and has 32 wickets to show for it.

· South Australia have been rocked by the suspension of their captain Johan Botha as a result of his poor conduct in their Round 9 fixture. He is also the second highest wicket taker in the competition with 36. They will be looking to Tom Cooper, who is the top scorer in the competition with 858 runs to lead the charge with the willow. The defending champion Tasmanians have a great record at home and will, no doubt, put out a pitch that seams which will play right into their hands.

· Western Australia and New South Wales are playing a semi final of sorts in this game. The Warriors possess two of the most consistent batters in the first class game in Marcus North and Adam Voges and it is no surprise that they lacked quality runs in their last game against Queensland which WA lost terribly. The New South Welshmen possess the leading wicket taker in the competition on Steve O’Keefe with 38 wickets at an average of 20.05 and one expects he will bowl “big” overs for them again in Canberra.

An exciting end to a strange season awaits on Tuesday. This is going to be epic!

Australians in South Africa 2014: finally some 3rd test reflections

As I have written elsewhere I was a bit crook on Wednesday night and Thursday and thus not in a position write about Australia’s epic victory in the 3rd test at Newlands.

Having had some time to reflect and watch a replay of Day 5 now here are some thoughts on the 3rd test:

Ryan Harris: courage personified

It is obvious to everyone that Ryan Harris’ knee is buggered. It was not obvious to anyone until after the end of the game that he was not supposed to bowl in the second innings of this game. To come back with 5 overs to go when even he thought he was spent was nothing short of miraculous.

David Warner: match winner from the naughty corner

Readers of this blog will know my views on Warner and his behaviour. Take it as read that nothing that occurred on day 5 assuaged me from that view. If he were to be judged on his batting alone though he was head and shoulders about the rest in this series and was a worthy Man of Match and Man of the Series.

Only South Africa could have held on like they did

Anyone wanting an answer to the why South Africa are the number test nation in the world need to look at their second innings in this test match. There is not other team in the game, Australia included, though could have even gotten close to batting out the last day in the manner they did.

Boring? Pig’s Arse!

I have had a few alleged “fans” of cricket say to me that day 5 of this test was boring and not helpful to the marketing of cricket. This sentiment sends me off the deep end because the battle on day 5 is precisely what test cricket ought be about. It was enthralling and thrilling cricket.

Questioning the umpires decision and sledging: a victory tarnished

This has already been written about by some and I wholeheartedly agree: it is hard to celebrate a victory when, as a fan, you are embarrassed by the way your winning team has conducted itself on the field. Darren Lehmann has bought many positives to this team but it behaviour, including the way some players speak to the umpires is nothing short of appalling and is already a massive negative of Lehmann’s reign. Am I happy we won? Yes but I, as a fan, am ashamed as well.

There could not have been a better ending, from an Australian perspective to the 2013/14 summer of test cricket. Test cricket fans now have a long wait till October when a series against Pakistan is scheduled.

Cricket: Sheffield Shield and the Pink Ball experiment

Cricket Australia’s experiment of day/night first class cricket kicks off today in Adelaide, Melbourne and Brisbane amid much fan fare and with the ultimate goal of holding a day/night test match in 2015/16.

The minutae of how day/night fight class will work includes:

  • The use of pink kookaburra balls.
  • Black sightscreens will be used.
  • Clothing will still be white.
  • Play will commence (Brisbane time) at 1:30pm with the usual game conditions to apply: 2 hour sessions, 40 minutes for lunch and 20 minutes for tea.
  • Play is scheduled to finish at 8:30pm with a possible extra 30 minutes available to finish the allotment of overs.

When I originally heard of day/night first class cricket I confess my first thoughts were significantly negative.  I saw it as solely a money grab but I now see the following benefits:

  • It makes cricket at a first class level more accessible to those who work, allowing those fans to attend a game they otherwise wouldn’t have.
  • Cricket, at test match level, could, if this trial is successful, be played in prime time which opens the game (again at test level) to a broader audience.
  • If cricket in the long form of the game does not innovate it will die a withering death: the crowds in the first and second test matches in South Africa are indicative of said indicative of said withering death.

It goes without saying that traditionalists, of which I am one, are not going to be massively enamoured with this change straight out of the gate. Equally, if Cricket Australia listens to feedback received and also refrains from making the day/night first class games too much like T20 games I believe this can be a move for the betterment of the game.

If I had to be negative about this trial, the thing I am disappointed in is the timing of the games. A Monday kick off to these fixtures means they will end on Thursday. If the ideology behind the day/night games was to get more fans in the gates then surely at least one day of the games had to be on the weekend.

I, for one, would love to attend the game at the Gabba and I work some 5 minutes from the ground but I am unlikely to attend because at the end of my working day (which is most often at around the start of the 3rd session) all I want to do is go home. A night of cricket on Friday / Saturday would have seen me there with bells on.

All in all today presents an opening of a door into, possibly, the future of first class cricket in Australia. It is also the penultimate round in the Sheffield Shield with a number of teams still chasing a spot in the finals. It will be exciting to see what happens!

Australia in South Africa 2014: 2nd Test Post Mortem

When I went to bed last night at tea on the fourth day of the second test match at St George’s Park I was confident of one thing: Australia would make South Africa work for its victory.  I woke up at about 3:30am, as men do, and on my way back from the bathroom checked the cricket score on my phone and was proven spectacularly wrong. Having lost 9-88 after the tea adjournment, Australia was thrashed by the Proteas by 231 runs.

Australia, even the Captain admits, was outplayed in ever aspect of the game by the South Africans in this test match and with five days now until the 3rd and final test match have much to work on to best the best team in the world.

Here are my 5 key issues arising out of the 2nd test match that Australia need to address:

  • Don’t blame being one bowler short: Much has been made in the press about Australia being one bowler short in this game with Shane Watson recuperating on the sidelines.  It would be fair to say that the Australians did look like they were missing that fifth bowler to churn through some key overs but one must not forget that South Africa were also a bowler short once Wayne Parnell hurt his groin after bowling just over 8 overs. The fact is Australia’s bowling attack did not get the job done.
  • It can’t all be about OMJ: Mitchell Johnson has bowled brilliantly in the last 6 test matches and showed glimpses of brilliance in this test match however on a wicket that did not support him and against an opposition more attuned to the game than their brethren in English colours he did not have anywhere near the effectiveness as in previously test matches.  Unfortunately, at the same time, neither of Peter Siddle nor Ryan Harris had enough impact to compensate.
  • Australia still can’t play reverse swing: Don’t get me wrong: the South Africa’s bowled immensely well on day four and, indeed, throughout the whole match.  That said, Australia’s performance against the reverse swinging ball on day 4 was horrid at best.  They had no answers for it from any of the South African quick bowlers and particularly Dale Steyn.  I do not know that there is an easy fix for this however if Australia do not find a way to combat reverse by Saturday they may find themselves in significant bother.
  • No middle order heroics puts top order in focus: I wrote earlier in the test match about the frailty of Australia’s top order and again in the second innings of this test match the top order, after the opening gambit of Rogers and Warner, was found wanting.  After excellent performances at Centurion, Doolan and Marsh looked out of their depth against the quality fo the South African bowlers and gave only meek resistance in both innings.  Unfortunately for them the trio of Clarke, Smith and Haddin could not save their metaphorical bacon as happened in Australia during the Ashes.
  • Stop the verbal: I have been lamenting for some time the prevalence of ‘verbal” interplay in Australia’s game plan and again in this game I am certain that verballing the opposition did nothing to enhance Australia’s cause.  For the avoidance of doubt, I have no cavil whatsoever with sledging, but there is a time and a place for it.  That time and place is not when you are getting hammered by the opposition.  From Michael Clarke’s statement about Graeme Smith’s captaincy through to David Warner’s ongoing need to chirp about everything. Australia as a team needs to have a long look at how it uses “the verbal” because it seems in this game it only served to give ammunition to the Proteas.

All in all it was a pretty sorry test match for the men in baggy green.  One would be remiss though to not mention some excellent performances that were left unrewarded by defeat:

  • Under pressure for his spot, in my view, Chris Rogers played exactly the innings that he was selected for in England.  Gritty and determined he looked largely at ease against the swing of the South Africans whilst around him the others perished.  As bizarre as it may seem this could well have been a career saving knock for “Buck”.
  • Despite my chastisement for his “chat”, David Warner was the pick of the Australian batters, Rogers’ hundred aside and again showed how destructive he can be.  He needs to bat for longer though obviously.
  • Nathan Lyon was Australia’s best bowler and was rewarded with a first innings “Michelle”.  Maligned by many before the Ashes in England it says a lot about this blokes character that he is now mentioned in the same breath as some of the best spinners in the current game at the moment.

So the Australian’s leave Port Elizabeth with much to work on and a confident opponent to defeat and head to Newlands in Cape Town where the South African’s have an imposing records since reintegration back into the international game.  Indeed, the only country they have lost a test match to at Newlands is Australia (1994, 2002 and 2006) and go into this match on an 11 game undefeated streak (including 3 draws). The series is certainly well poised.

Cricket: Is this the end for Shane Watson?

As often happens in sport, Shane Watson has sat on the side lines injured during the present test being played at Centurion in South Africa and has seen his replacement, Shaun Marsh, and the new number 3 batsman picked to replace George Bailey, Alex Doolan, both score runs against the bowling attack touted as the best in the world. 

These runs for Doolan and Marsh have come despite both players seemingly being out of sorts in the domestic long form of the game in Australia and whilst Watson has succumbed to a calf injury for the, at least, 4th time in recent memory.

The question for the Australian selectors must now be: what do we do with Shane? I know it is only one test match and I know that I am most regularly at the front of the queue when it comes to defending my fellow Ipswichian: but off the back of another injury and limited productivity with the bat over the course of hit career the question must be asked.

For me it actually comes down to what happens when Australia bowl for the win at some point today.  Australia only have 4 front line bowlers to share the burden of getting the South Africans out.  If they struggle to do so (Adelaide 2012 comes to mind) and start to tire then we will all be looking around for the 5th bowler who can churn through some overs: which is the other string to Watson’s bow.  If the quartet of Harris, Johnson, Siddle and Lyon do what they did to England during the summer almost gone in Australia then we may well be asking: Shane who?

For me the balance of any cricket team (forgetting my position firmly as a fan of Shane Watson) is always at its best when it contains 4 front line bowlers with an all rounder who can trundle down some overs when needed.  So to me Australia needs to find a place for an all rounder and the best in the country at the moment is Shane Watson. 

Unfortunately, that would mean one of the new men in the line up would have to drop out which would be a shame given their form.  If that does not happen and the selectors remain keen to select S Watson then I have a real fear the man to go could be the oldest man in the team , Chris Rogers.  This would not just be a travesty it, it would be a monumental slap in the face for one of the most popular cricket men in the country.  That said, in terms of longevity he would have to be the one in doubt.

Of course this is a good problem to, suddenly it feels, have for Australian cricket administrators and fans: a clamour for seats on the test match bus that has seemed to arrive from nowhere.

Then again though, I may be getting a bit ahead of myself … afterall: we have not won this test yet.